Legal Opinion

Stanford v. Morgan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1979No. KCD 30077PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW JACKSON HIGGINS, Special Judge.

Appeal by plaintiff from judgment on verdict for defendant in medical malpractice action premised on failure of informed consent. The questions are: whether the court should have defined “negligent”; whether plaintiff was entitled to show defendant’s malpractice insurance coverage; whether plaintiff was entitled to testimony of an undisclosed psychologist; whether a defense expert witness should have been barred under the witness exclusion rule; whether the trial court abused its discretion in conduct of chambers proceedings with respect to recesses and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Gridley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  3. State v. LordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Wilcox v. CoonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Harriman v. HarrimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spaunhorst v. SpaunhorstMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Carter v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Carlisle v. Kroger Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Frasher ex rel. Autenrieth v. WhitsellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. PollockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API