Legal Opinion

Rohde v. Ann Arbor Public School

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 2005No. Docket 253565PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right the opinion and order granting defendants summary disposition. We affirm.

Plaintiffs are individual taxpayers who live in the Ann Arbor school district. Defendants provide medical benefits to certain same-sex partners of Ann Arbor Public Schools (AAPS) employees, but these benefits do not extend to unmarried heterosexual partners of AAPS employees. Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief prohibiting the provision of these benefits, which are paid for with public funds derived from state and local tax revenues. Defendants moved for summary-disposition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Koontz v. Ameritech Services, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Waterford School District v. State Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Eaton Rapids Community HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Salinas v. Genesys Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WoolfolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Flint Cold Storage v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Rohde v. Ann Arbor Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re Beatrice Rottenberg Living TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API