A. P. Cook Co. v. Beard
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Jackson; Peck, J. Bill by the A. P. Cook Company, Limited, to enjoin Francis H. Beard and others from overflowing complainant’s lands. From a decree for part of the relief prayed, ■complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant is the owner and in possession of nearly the entire of sections 29 and 32 of the township of Columbia, Jackson county, and files this bill to restrain defendants from overflowing these lands. Vineyard lake consists of two arms called the “Upper Vineyard Lake” and “Lower Vineyard Lake,” and covers a portion of sections 33,- 28, 29, and 32. The south branch of the river Raisin enters Upper Vineyard lake, and furnishes the outlet of Lower Vineyard lake to the north, and runs thence substantially northwest to and beyond the mill and mill-dam of defendants. The lowlands of complainant.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Brockway v. Hydraulic Power & Light Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Reason v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Flynn v. ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- West Virginia Development Co. v. Preston County Development Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915