Legal Opinion

Severance v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1990No. 893SC681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s order.

Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c), a motion for summary judgment “shall be rendered ... if the pleadings, depositions, . . . affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter. of law.” This remedy permits the trial court to decide whether a genuine issue of material fact exists; it does not allow the court to decide an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Ipock v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Stoltz v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Sauls v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Bowling v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Severance v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Akins v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API