Akins v. Mission St. Joseph's Health System, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, judge.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether a judgment entered pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 68(a) (2007), constitutes a “judgment” within the meaning of N.C. Gen. Stat. § lB-3(e) (2007), such that satisfaction of such judgment discharges all other tortfeasors from liability to the claimant for the same injury. We answer in the affirmative.
The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows: On 3 June 2003, Tommy Akins and his wife, Stacy Akins, (collectively “plaintiffs”) initiated an action against Constantino Cona (“Dr. Cona”), Asheville Radiology…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Poole v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Yates v. New South Pizza, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Ipock v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Akins v. MISSION ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Asr v. HansenDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Ebw Judgment)North Carolina Business Court · 2017