Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Mendelsohn

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal bv the defendant Schlang from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the Court

■ Seabury, J.

The plaintiff, an attorney, brings this action to recover a balance alleged to be due Mm for professional services. Mendelsohn and Schlang were copartners, and the services of the plaintiff were rendered in connection with bringing about a dissolution of the copartnership. The evidence leaves no room to doubt that the plaintiff was employed by the firm of Mendelsohn & Schlang and that the debt due the plaintiff was a liability of the partnership.

■ As a result of the services rendered, Mendelsohn and Schlang entered into an agreement with one another, under the terms of which it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Savage v. . PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. United States National Bank v. UnderwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Morrisey v. BermanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Advance Rubber Co. v. BershadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
  2. Phillips v. SchlangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API