Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Maropco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided February 22, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-3236-GPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
A. JOE FISH, Senior United States District Judge
Before the court are the plaintiffs’ motions (1) for leave to file an amended complaint (docket entry 9) and (2) to remand the case to the state court from which it was previously removed (docket entry 8). For the reasons stated below, the motions are granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs commenced this action in the 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas on June 22, 2015, asserting various claims under Texas law relating to Preston Marshall (“Marshall”)’s employment with the defendant, MarOpCo, Inc.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Atlantic Marine Constr. Co. v. United States Dist. Court for Western Dist. of Tex.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BLF Land, LLC v. FrerichDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
- Connie Norris v. Magnolia Water Utilities Operating Company, LLC, Magnolia Water Services Group, LLC, Magnolia Water Holding Company, LLC, Louisiana Central States Water, LLC, Central States Water Resources, Inc., Louisiana Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- Highland Lakes Title, Ltd. v. WootenDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
- Porter v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021