Legal Opinion

Helvy v. Sweat

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1982No. 8119SC958PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the trial judge erred by granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. A motion for a directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure presents the same question for both trial and appellate courts: Whether the evidence, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, was sufficient for submission to the jury. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward, 49 N.C. App. 642, 272 S.E. 2d 357 (1980). Although the record does not include defendant’s motion for directed verdict nor does the judgment indicate on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Ingram v. . Smoky Mountain Stages, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. Guilford County Tradewind Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. Castle McCulloch, Inc. v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Talian v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Parrish Funeral Home, Inc. v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Biscoe Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API