Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 2012No. 5D10-2768Published

1Per curiam

We affirm Thompson’s conviction without prejudice to Thompson to timely seek postconviction relief challenging the trial court’s imposition of a 25-year minimum mandatory term. See Dunbar v. State, 35 So.3d 54, 55 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (sentencing errors that occur after effective date of amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), even if formerly deemed fundamental or patent on face of record, cannot be reviewed by appellate court if issue is not raised at sentencing or in timely post-sentencing proceeding pursuant to rule 3.800); see also Williams v. State, 56 So.3d 899 (Fla.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API