Legal Opinion
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Ingram
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 27, 1994No. 92-2059PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.
With respect to the first issue on appeal before this court, appellant argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to deviate from the back pay period set forth in the commission’s order of November 14, 1985. However, our review of R.C. 4112.06 leads us to conclude otherwise. R.C. 4112.06 provided in part:
*92“(A) * * * the commission may obtain an order of court for the enforcement of its final orders, in a proceeding as provided in this section. Such proceeding shall be brought in the common pleas court of the state within any county wherein the unlawful discriminatory practice which…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Alvin Hunter v. Allis-Chalmers Corporation, Engine Division, and Andre J. Lambert, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Carolyn Carter v. University of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Genaro. v. Central Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Judy Gettings v. Building Laborers Local 310 Fringe Benefits FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Cline v. Catholic Diocese of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Jayne Knox v. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.