Legal Opinion
Policemen's Annuity & Benefit v. City of Milw.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided April 17, 2001No. 99-0965PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
¶1. The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund of the City of Milwaukee ("PABF") and George H. Sprague, et. al, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a declaratory judgment action against the City of Milwaukee. PABF claims the trial court erroneously ruled that: (1) no express or statutory trust was created to require the City to make "in lieu" widow's annuity and other contributions from 1969 to 1989; (2) the six-year statute of limitations in Wis. Stat. § 893.43 (1999 — 2000) bars PABF's claim; and (3) the City is not estopped from raising a statute of limitations defense. PABF further…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Wilharms v. WilharmsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Hester v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Welter v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zastrow v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Coleman v. McCaughtryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Riegleman v. KriegCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Haferman v. St. Clare Healthcare Foundation, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.