Hornsby v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
DARR, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff has moved the Court to re-tax the costs in this case. The costs were taxed on June 8, 1950 and plaintiff’s motion to retax was filed on June 27, 1950, nineteen days later.
It is provided in Rule 54(d), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., that “on motion served within 5 days (after taxed by the Clerk) the action of the clerk may he reviewed by the court.” There is thus a limitation of five days within which the Court may review the tax bill.
This time limitation may be enlarged under Rule 6(b) if application therefor is *458made before the time expires; or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. One Ford CoupeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walker v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Delaware Valley Marine Supply Co. v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Roberts v. BailarDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Clarke F. Walker v. State Of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999