Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Bailar
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 21, 1980No. CIV-3-77-289PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEESE, District Judge.
This is an action by the plaintiff Mrs. Bernice Roberts, a white female employee of the Postal Service, against the Postmaster General in his capacity as head of that governmental entity. It is governed by the provisions of 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(f) through (k). 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(d).
Mrs. Roberts claims that personnel actions of the Postal Service affecting here were not free from discrimination based on her sex. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a). It’s purport is that she was a victim of disparate treatment by her employer. The judgment of January 25, 1978 herein,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clayton-Brame v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DHSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Roberts v. BailarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982