Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Lacy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 4, 1957No. [No. 228, October Term, 1956.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

To be determined in this appeal is the validity of the contention of Phillips Clarke and Mae Clarke, his sister, appellants, that they still have contract rights to develop, and share in, certain land of Mary Lacy, appellee. The chancellor decided that under the terms of the contract their rights had expired with the passage of time and dismissed their bill seeking declarations of their claimed rights and an injunction against transfer of the land.

Mary Meidel, the mother of Mary Lacy, owned some thirty or forty acres close to the Anacostia River and the District of Columbia line. She died in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maughlin v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  2. Foard v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Coleman v. ApplegarthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  4. Lurman v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Sinclair v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coopersmith v. IsherwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  2. Barnes v. EusterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Myerberg, Sawyer & Rue, P.A. v. AgeeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  4. Shea v. MartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  5. Schlee v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API