Legal Opinion
Diodato v. Eastchester Development Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 20, 1985PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter *304alia, to recover damages for fraud in the inducement to enter into a contract, to recover damages for breach of that contract, and for specific performance thereof, defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered August 16, 1983, as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs’ cause of action to recover damages for fraud in the inducement.
Order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ allegations that defendants falsely promised to equip…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wittenberg v. RobinovNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Tougher Heating & Plumbing Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Ducor's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mazzola v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Royal Bank & Trust Co. v. Pereira (In Re Lady Madonna Industries, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Mir v. MirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Pereira v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corp. (In Re Kam Kuo Seafood Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.