Legal Opinion

State v. Euge

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 1961No. 30646PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

Defendant, Harvey F. Euge, was found guilty of the offense of issuing a check with intent to defraud, in violation of Section 561.460 (all statutory references are to 'RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) and his punishment ■fixed by the jury at a fine of $200. He appealed from the ensuing judgment, but .filed no brief in this court, nor did the State. Accordingly, we review the essential record and the assignments in defendant’s motion for a new trial properly preserving alleged error for review. Supreme Court Rules 27.20, 28.02, 28.08, V.A.M.R.; State v. James, Mo., 347 S.W.2d 211.

Defe…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. State v. RascoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. State v. VarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. State v. RollieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. State v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API