State v. Euge
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
Defendant, Harvey F. Euge, was found guilty of the offense of issuing a check with intent to defraud, in violation of Section 561.460 (all statutory references are to 'RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) and his punishment ■fixed by the jury at a fine of $200. He appealed from the ensuing judgment, but .filed no brief in this court, nor did the State. Accordingly, we review the essential record and the assignments in defendant’s motion for a new trial properly preserving alleged error for review. Supreme Court Rules 27.20, 28.02, 28.08, V.A.M.R.; State v. James, Mo., 347 S.W.2d 211.
Defe…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State v. RascoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. VarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- State v. RollieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.