Legal Opinion

In re Fazzary

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 21, 2015No. Case No. 3:14-bk-5515-PMGPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AGAINST DEBTOR AND DEBTOR’S COUNSEL PURSUANT TO RULE 9011

PAUL M. GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge

THIS CASE came before the Court for a final evidentiary hearing to consider the Motion of Capital City Bank (the Bank) for Imposition of Sanctions against Debtor and Debtor’s Counsel Pursuant to Rule 9011. (Doc. 14). The Debtor, Mark Faz-zary, filed a Verified Response to the Motion and Reciprocal Motion for Expenses and Fees against Creditor and Creditor’s Counsel. (Doc. 33).

Sanctions under Rule 9011 may be warranted if a bankruptcy case was filed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens, Bankrupt. Charles E. Kitchens and Olivia L. Kitchens v. Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Glatter v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Beepot v. J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  5. Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Desma Nicole RashidiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
  2. Lee E. ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
  3. Liliana Arlette Grajales CalderonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API