Legal Opinion

Helm v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

IN APPEAL.

1Opinion of the Court

McGirk Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Wilson brought an action of assumpsit on a special agreement; the fiist count goes for an agreement by which Wilson agreed to dig a ditch and tail race for a mill, the race was to be of a certain description. Helm was todo certain things on his part to enable the plaintiff to proceed. Then there is a count on the quantum meruit — issue non assumpsit. There was proof of the special agreement; there was also proof, though somewhat conflicting, that some of the work, that is the tail race, was done according to contract. There was evidence to shew…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LevyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Woods v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Davidson v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Lee v. AshbrookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API