Legal Opinion

Biltmore Land Co. v. Roney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1934No. Docket Nos. 118, 119, Calendar Nos. 38,059, 38,060PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

The Biltmore Land Company brought suit at law against Edward C. Roney and Rosemary T. Roney to recover amount due on a land contract, covering lot 150 in a subdivision. Defendants, by plea, set up rescission by them on account of a shortage of land in the lot, through a mistake in the plat lines, and by notice of set-off and recoupment asked judgment against plaintiff for all sums paid on the contract. In reply plaintiff admitted a shortage by reason of error in the plat and set up the quantity thereof, averred ability to supply a part of the shortage and willingness to submit to a reasonable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In Re Bathwick's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Napier v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Miller v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API