Legal Opinion

Smith v. Town of Dewey Beach

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided May 1, 1987No. Civ. A. Nos. 86-393-JLL, 86-405-JLLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Currently before the Court are motions by the defendant William J. Hopkins (“Hopkins”), Director of Parks and Recreation for the State of Delaware, to dismiss all claims against him in both of the above captioned actions. This Court has jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1332 due to the complete diversity of the parties. The facts of both cases are virtually identical and the same attorneys represent the plaintiffs in each case. Therefore, the actions were consolidated for the purpose of arguing the present motions and this opinion applies to both…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manchester v. RzewnickiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Commissioners of Dewey BeachDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1988
  3. Godson v. Delaware Department of Natural ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022
  4. Lui v. Commission on Adult Entertainment Establishments of the DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API