Legal Opinion

Michael McLaughlin v. Adam Laxalt

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 4, 2016No. 15-15847UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner Michael Tracy McLaughlin appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Although the district court denied relief on all of Petitioner’s claims, it granted a certificate of appealability on the issue whether Petitioner’s trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and present a voluntary intoxication defense during Petitioner’s trial. We “review de novo the district court’s denial of [a] petition for a writ of habeas corpus and review its factual findings for clear error,” Smith v. Ryan, 823 F.3d 1270, 1278-79…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Detrich v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael McLaughlin v. Ronald OliverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API