Michael McLaughlin v. Adam Laxalt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner Michael Tracy McLaughlin appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Although the district court denied relief on all of Petitioner’s claims, it granted a certificate of appealability on the issue whether Petitioner’s trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to investigate and present a voluntary intoxication defense during Petitioner’s trial. We “review de novo the district court’s denial of [a] petition for a writ of habeas corpus and review its factual findings for clear error,” Smith v. Ryan, 823 F.3d 1270, 1278-79…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gregory Dickens v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Detrich v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael McLaughlin v. Ronald OliverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024