Legal Opinion

Otts v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1989No. 88-891, 88-898 and 88-1076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

These petitions for writs of certiorari were granted and consolidated because all three involve the same issue of first impression: whether a person sentenced to more than ten years under the Alabama Split Sentence Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 15-18-8, is entitled to incentive “good time” credit under the Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act, §§ 14-9-40 through -44 (hereinafter the “ACIT Act”), if his period of confinement is less than ten years. All three petitioners filed habeas corpus petitions in order to have the ACIT Act applied to them; in each case, the trial court denied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  3. Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Shivener v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API