Legal Opinion
Hart, Schaffner & Marx v. Vaughn
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1936No. Civ. 10087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This action is upon a guaranty executed by defendant in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was given in favor of defendant, from which plaintiff appeals. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts and a bill of exceptions.
In 1928 one J. R. Vaughn, a cousin of respondent, established in Berkeley a retail clothing business conducted under the name of “Vaughn-at-Sather Gate”. It was agreed between him and appellant that appellant would provide him with the greater part of the merchandise needed in his business. The said merchandise was to be sold him on credit, and to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce of Kansas City, Mo. v. RockefellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Glassell v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Murphy v. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. KelseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- United States ex rel. Jackson Ornamental Iron & Bronze Works v. BrentDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hollywood Wholesale Electric Co. v. John Baskin, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
- J. C. Wattenbarger & Sons v. SandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- General Electric Co. v. Central Surety & InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Orlopp v. Willardson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.