Legal Opinion

Powers v. Pac carolina/barrus Constr. Co.

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 16, 2004No. I.C. NO. 084629Published

1Opinion of the Court

The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Holmes.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS

1.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Royster v. Culp, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Hunt v. Tender Loving Care Home Care Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Puett v. Bahnson Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Jennings v. Backyard Burgers of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API