Legal Opinion

Chavez v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 12, 2011No. 09-2274, 09-2288PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Chief Judge.

This is a collective action brought under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) by current and former employees (collectively, the Employees) of the defendant City of Albuquerque, New Mexico (the City), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (FLSA). The FLSA generally requires employers to compensate overtime hours at one and one-half times an employee’s “regular rate” of pay. The district court concluded that the City violated the FLSA by failing to include compensation for unused vacation and sick time (vacation and sick leave buy-backs) in the FLSA…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Sivetts v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ellis v. J.R.'s Country Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  3. Landry v. Swire Oilfield Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  4. Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
  5. Jones v. Addictive Behavioral Change Health Grp., LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API