Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Wardell-Whitton Road Improvement District

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). The change in the road in question was made in conformity with the statutes relating to the establishment and alteration of public highways. No appeal was taken from the decision of the county court establishing the road as laid out by the viewers. Hence the present suit is a collateral attack on the judgment of the' county court in changing the public road.

It is well settled in this State that a judgment may only be attacked collaterally where, by the record, it is shown that there is a want of jurisdiction in the court rendering it, either of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Crittenden Lumber Co. v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Dickerson v. Tri-County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Blanton v. Forrest City Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  5. Lonoke County v. CarlLeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sewell v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Winfrey v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Black v. BurrellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Urquhart v. UrquhartDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API