Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Reed

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 9, 1934No. 4-3437PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

On the 23d day of May, 1933, Joe Reed, appellee, filed his complaint in the Ouachita Chancery Court, in which he alleged “that he, George Reed, Mary Reed Gaskin, Arthur W. Sewell and John W. Sewell, minors, heirs at law of Parthenia Berry Sewell, deceased, and certain other parties, the heirs at law of Millie Reed Weaver, deceased, were the owners as tenants in common of the west half of the northeast quarter and the east half of the northwest quarter of section 33, township 15 south, range 15 west, in Ouachita County, Arkansas, and that they derived title to said lands through Fannie Reed,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cassady v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Clements v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Cocks v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Brittin v. HandySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1859
  5. Moore v. WoodallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Purser v. Corpus Christi State National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Council of Co-Owners for the Lakeshore Resort v. Glyneu, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Marshall v. MarthinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Bright v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API