Legal Opinion
United States v. Eloy Salazar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1983No. 82-1588PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Eloy Salazar was convicted, after a jury trial, on two counts 1 of unlawful acquisition and possession of food stamps in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b). Defendant appeals his conviction on four grounds. He argues that (1) § 2024(b) is unconstitutionally vague; (2) the indictment under which he was charged is insufficient; (3) the Government unconstitutionally singled him out for prosecution; and (4) the conduct of the Government agents investigating him was so outrageous as to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree with all of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. Bobby Ray MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William A. Kilpatrick, Declan J. O'donnell, Sheila C. Lerner, the Bank of Nova Scotia, Michael Alberga, C.S. Gill, and C.M. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Vinton Bedonie and Thomas ClyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.