State v. Wells, 22389 (9-26-2008)

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Spencer Wells, acting pro se, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He contends that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a hearing on his petition, and by denying the petition.

{¶ 2} We conclude that Wells failed to present facts sufficient to establish substantive grounds for relief. Therefore, we conclude that the trial court did not err in failing to conduct a hearing or in denying the petition. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is Affirmed.

I

{¶ 3} In August 2006, Wells was charged by indictment with four…