Legal Opinion

Detroit United Railway v. Oakland Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1921No. Calendar No. 29,689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus and prohibition by the Detroit United Railway to compel Frank L. Covert, circuit judge of Oakland county, to vacate an order granting an injunction and to refrain from exercising jurisdiction in said case.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Under the provisions of Act No. 382, Public Acts of 1919 (hereafter called the Smith act), as construed by this court in Attorney General v. Railway, 210 Mich. 227, the plaintiff road is permitted to charge a rate of fare of two cents per mile. Such rate is, however, subject to the following proviso, found in section 2 of the act:

“Provided, That this, act shall not apply to the rates of street or interurban railroads charged in the transportation of passengers within the limits of cities, or within a distance of five miles of the boundaries thereof.”

In such territory, the rates are as fixed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Attorney General v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. City of Traverse City v. Citizens' Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gimbel Bros. v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Gravel Co. v. Detroit & MacKinac Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. La Salle Townhouses Cooperative Ass'n v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. La Salle Townhouses Cooperative Ass'n v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API