Legal Opinion

In Re William T.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1985No. F005354PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HANSON (P. D.), J.

On March 4, 1985, petitioner William T. (father) was found in contempt by the Stanislaus County Superior Court for failure *794to comply with visitation orders on three separate occasions. In defense of his failure to comply, the father offered certified copies of orders issued by the Solano County Juvenile Court on December 18, 1984, and January 17, 1985, restricting visits between Nicole and her mother and grandmother and ordering supervision by the Solano County Welfare Department of those visits.

The Stanislaus County court stated:

“Well, we went through the question I…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Adoptions v. Robert E.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Cheryl H.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Ruddock v. OhlsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Greene v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bryan v. FawkesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. Ex Parte Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Gerace v. BentleySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. In Interest of DLDMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API