Legal Opinion
Bannan v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 18, 1997PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
NEWMAN, J.A.D.
Claimant, F. Russell Bannan, Jr., appeals from the final decision of the Board of Review affirming the Appeal Tribunal, which required claimant to refund $708 in overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
Claimant was employed by E.I. Dupont for twenty-nine years and accepted a retirement in July 1995. Payment of his retirement benefits would not begin until the end of September 1995. In the interim, claimant worked full time as a security guard for Coastal Oil Company. Claimant worked forty hours for the weeks ending August…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Zielenski v. Bd. of Rev., Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Stauhs v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Brewer v. CantrellDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
- Boyd v. Dept. of Inst. and AgenciesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Hopkins v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re McWilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- In Re MewbornUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- CALEDA L. WOODS VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
- CELESTE A. LAMPLEY VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- JEFFREY HERSH VS. BOARD OF REVIEW (DEPARTMENT OF LABOR)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.