Morton v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Writ of Error to the District Court of Eamsey County. The Defendants • answer was stricken out on motion, with leave to answer, «fee. Judgment was entered upon default. The points and authorities of the respective parties are not on file.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
I. Atwater, J.
This is a writ of Error, brought by Morton, one of the Defendants in the Court below, to reverse a judgment of the District Court of Eamsey County, rendered against him and certain other Defendants, the others having suffered judgment by default.
The complaint was upon a promissory note made by Morton, payable to the order of William H. Eandall, and, as is alleged, endorsed by him to the firm of Langley & Scales, and by said firm endorsed to the Plaintiff before the maturity of the note; and concluding, with the usual allegations, to charge the endorsers, and that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- United States v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Anderson v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Mier v. CartledgeNew York Supreme Court · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Conway v. WhartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Bartow v. Northern Assur. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Commander Milling Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Hayward v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868