Legal Opinion

Collins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1945No. 10846PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, James H. Collins, Sidney I'ischgrund and Christopher E. Schirm, were indicted and tried for, and were found guilty of, violating § 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 88, by conspiring to violate § 17(a) (1) of the Securities Act of 1933, IS U.S.C.A. § 77q(a) (1), and to violate § 215 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 338. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were made and denied, and appellants were brought before the court for sentence, whereupon the court said: “It is the judgment of the court that the imposition of the sentence in this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Korematsu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Miller v. AderholdSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Hodges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward William LancerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. AtkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. Edward William LancerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API