Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Atkins

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 21, 1957No. 9159Published

1DissentLatimeR, Judge

I dissent.

Although there can be no doubt that a board of review is clothed with the power to affirm such part of a sentence as- it deems appropriate, the effect of the decision of the Court is to invest *81the board with the right to refuse to affirm any sentence. The theory seems to be that the power to affirm part of a sentence begets a discretion not to permit any punishment. I cannot agree, for I am persuaded that the right of a board to determine the appropriateness of sentence does not embrace the power to forgive the accused from all punishment imposed by the court-martial. To the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1891
  4. United States v. FreemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. GoodwinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API