United States v. Atkins
United States Court of Military Appeals
1DissentLatimeR, Judge
I dissent.
Although there can be no doubt that a board of review is clothed with the power to affirm such part of a sentence as- it deems appropriate, the effect of the decision of the Court is to invest *81the board with the right to refuse to affirm any sentence. The theory seems to be that the power to affirm part of a sentence begets a discretion not to permit any punishment. I cannot agree, for I am persuaded that the right of a board to determine the appropriateness of sentence does not embrace the power to forgive the accused from all punishment imposed by the court-martial. To the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1891
- United States v. FreemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. GoodwinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.