Legal Opinion
People v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 7, 1989No. B033483PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), appellant Herbie Clark pleaded nolo contendere and was found guilty of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). He was sentenced to state prison for the low term of two years. As we conclude there was no unlawful search or seizure and the motion to suppress was properly denied, we affirm.
Factual Background
At approximately 7:15 p.m. on November 1, 1987, Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff Brian Hawksley was in Plummer Park with his partner Deputy Rangel when he saw appellant, who appeared to be a transient,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. CastanedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gibson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.