Legal Opinion · Dissent
Purdy v. Massey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 1, 1931No. Appeal, 305Published
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Kephart:
My objection to the majority opinion relates solely to the rule relating to the measure of damages which is there adopted and based on Mechanics Trust Co. v. Fidelity Casualty Co., 304 Pa. 526, as controlling.
"While there is a distinction between indemnity and guaranty bonds, it is not important where only the measure of damages is involved. Under either contract the rule as to damages is compensation for the loss suffered. In one it is payable only when the insured actually sustains and has paid a loss; in the other, the compensation is recoverable…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Mechanics Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Province Securities Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Longfellow v. McGregorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Wheeler v. Equitable Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.