Legal Opinion

Harper v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 18, 1934No. 24366PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beoyees, O. J.

1. It does not appear that the alleged newly discovered evidence offered in support of the motion for a new trial could have been obtained by the defendant at the trial by the exercise of due diligence; and although the evidence was impeaching in its character, it, if credited by the jury, would be likely to produce a different verdict on another trial; and “the real ultimate criterion by which the merit of such testimony should be measured is the probability of a different result;” and when that probability appears, “the ends of justice require that a new trial be granted.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nolan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Paden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Todd v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Spaulding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Stembridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API