Harper v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beoyees, O. J.
1. It does not appear that the alleged newly discovered evidence offered in support of the motion for a new trial could have been obtained by the defendant at the trial by the exercise of due diligence; and although the evidence was impeaching in its character, it, if credited by the jury, would be likely to produce a different verdict on another trial; and “the real ultimate criterion by which the merit of such testimony should be measured is the probability of a different result;” and when that probability appears, “the ends of justice require that a new trial be granted.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nolan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Paden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Todd v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Spaulding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Stembridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Cawthon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.