Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1946No. 31254PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. "The real ultimate criterion by which the merit of such testimony [newly discovered evidence] should be measured is the probability of a different result; and when that probability appears, the ends of justice require that a new trial be granted."

2. Special ground 2 does not show reversible error.

DECIDED JUNE 13, 1946.

Ralph McDaniel and Vernon (Doc) Hammond were convicted on an indictment charging them with arson. They filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and error is assigned on this judgment.

The State's evidence substantially shows that Joe Pippin testified for the State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Nolan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Paden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Brand v. City of LawrencevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Codianna v. MorrisUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. FreemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fincher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  4. Pace v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API