Legal Opinion
South Carolina Wildlife Federation v. Limehouse
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 5, 2008No. 07-1431PublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge KING joined.
OPINION
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:
The South Carolina Wildlife Federation and co-plaintiffs (collectively “SCWF”) brought suit against federal and state agencies and agency directors, alleging violations of the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., arising from the proposed construction of the Briggs-DeLaine-Pearson Connector (“the Connector”) in South Carolina. Relevant to this appeal, the Director of the South Carolina Department of Transportation (“the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- McBurney v. CuccinelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Kerr v. Marshall University Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Roxanne Adams v. Debra FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.