Legal Opinion

McDonell v. Continental Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 1920No. 9832PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from County Court, Tulsa County; H. L: Standeven, Judge. Action between -George R. MeDonell and the Continental Supply Company and others. From the judgment, MteDonell brings error,

1Opinion of the CourtJohn-Son, J.

The record discloses that on the 1st day of June,' 1917, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the principal defendant in the case by default for the principal sum of $478.95 and $57.85 -as attorneys’ fees, together with the costs of the action. That thereafter, on July .10, 1917, execution issued thereon, upon which a return was made on July 12, 1917, with an in-dorsement of no property found. And thereafter a garnishment was sued out, and on August 9, 1917, duly -served upon the Oklahoma State Oil Company, a corporation, -as garnishee, and such garnishee was on September 17, 1917,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Cowart v. Parker-Washington Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Nelson, Admx.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Bond v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verschoyle v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Landers v. Bank of Commerce of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Gilmore v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Rorem v. BodineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Wiley v. New Home Sewing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API