Legal Opinion

Meridianal Co. v. Moeck

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1927PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The plaintiff alleges in addition to its corporate character, in substance, that the defendants, George F. Moeck, Jr., and one Fred Trow, had transactions with each other relating to the purchase by the defendant of goods and merchandise from Trow, and about January 1, 1919, said Fred Trow rendered and delivered to defendant an account stated, covering said transactions, wherein and whereby said Trow stated and exhibited a demand of and upon the defendant for a balance of $594.64, then and there fixed as due and payable by defendant to said Trow.

The defendant assented to said account stated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foste v. Standard InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Steinmetz v. GrennonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Davis v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Crawford v. HutchinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Fleischner, Mayer & Co. v. KubliOregon Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. BoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lang v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Spitznass v. First National Bank of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API