Sorrells v. State

RUFFIN, Chief Judge.

A jury found Renard Sorrells guilty of two counts of armed robbery. Sorrells appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He also argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we do not weigh the evidence or resolve issues of witness credibility.1 We merely determine whether the evidence, viewed favorably to the jury’s verdict, authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt.2

Construed in this manner, the evidence shows…