Houston v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
A jury found Freddie Houston guilty of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of robbery. After the trial court denied Houston’s amended motion for new trial, he appeals, challenging the admission of similar transaction evidence, the denial of his motion to sever, and the sufficiency of the evidence. Having determined that no reversible error occurred, we affirm.
On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and an appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. This court determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Agony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stewart v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Walker v. HoustonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.