Legal Opinion
State v. Thurman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1994No. Nos. WD 49568, WD 46434PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLIS, Judge.
In State v. Thurman, 887 S.W.2d 403 (Mo.App.1994), this court remanded Jeffrey Thurman’s direct appeal with instructions that the trial court hold a hearing to determine, in accordance with State v. Parker, 836 S.W.2d 930 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 636, 121 L.Ed.2d 666 (1992), whether the State exercised its peremptory strikes in a racially discriminatory manner. Although Parker was decided some six months after Thurman’s trial concluded, we held that Parker should be applied retroactively to cases which, like Thurman’s, were not yet final or were pending on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. PullenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Brown v. Chicopee Fire Fighters, Local 1710, IaffSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HaydenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HeckenlivelyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. NortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. WintersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. MAURICE D. JONESMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015