Legal Opinion

Harlow v. . La Brum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1897PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 5, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff was entitled to judgment in his favor on the pleadings; it was a- reversible, error to grant defendant affirmative relief.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered December 5, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit. The nature of the action and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff was entitled to judgment in his favor on the pleadings; it was a- reversible, error to grant defendant affirmative relief. (Fleischmann v. Stern, 90 N. Y. 110; Beard v. Tilghman, 66 Hun, 12.) Defendant’s answer contains no denial, nor any statement of new matter…

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for the dissolution of a co-partnership between the parties and for an accounting. After the commencement of the action, the defendant discovered that a fraud had been practiced upon him, through which he had been induced to enter into the co-partnership. It consisted in fraudulent representations made by the plaintiff as to the cost of a certain stock,of merchandise, which he put into the co-partnership, and the half of which, as represented, the defendant had paid in compliance with his co-partnership agreement. He, thereupon interposed an answer setting up…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Peine v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Maruca v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API