Legal Opinion

(SS) Akin v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 1, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00608Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARITY MICHELLE AKIN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0608 JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN ) FAVOR OF DEFENDANT, ANDREW M. SAUL, 13 v. ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, AND ) AGAINST PLAINTIFF CHARITY MICHELLE 14 ANDREW M. SAUL1, ) AKIN Commissioner of Social Security, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Charity Michelle Akin asserts she is entitled to disability insurance benefits and a period of 18 disability under Title II of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API