Legal Opinion

Kern v. Burnham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Macon. Heard before the Hon. James B. Clabk.

1Opinion of the CourtGoldthwaitb, C. J.

The object of the bill is, to set aside a fraudulent sale of land, made by a guardian to his ward, during his minority, and to compel an account. ‘

The chancellor suppressed the depositions of two of the witnesses who' were examined on the part of the complainant; and his action in this respect is assigned as error. But it is unnecessary to go into an examination of the question presented by this assignment,, for the reason, that we are satisfied that, if the evidence which was excluded had been received, it could not affect the decision of the case upon its merits. — Gould v. Hays, 25 Ala.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  2. Gould v. HaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  2. Voltz v. VoltzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Dent v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Harrison v. DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  5. Hester v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API