Marshall v. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Breese
The only question, of any real importance, presented by this record, which we are disposed to discuss, is, “ Were the dying declarations of the boy admissible in evidence to charge the defendant?”
The action was case, to recover damages for death occasioned by the careless management of a railroad locomotive, and brought by the father of the boy killed, as his next of kin and personal representative.
This is a new question in this court, and quite an interesting one, which we lack time to discuss at any great length. A few principles of evidence will be noticed, and such opinions as text…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kent v. WaltonNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Wilson v. BoeremNew York Supreme Court · 1818
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barnett v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Berry v. American Standard, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- State v. MeekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
- Brom v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.