Legal Opinion
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Chiles Power Supply, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided October 27, 1999No. IP 99-82-MISCPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company is plaintiff in an action pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Goodyear has filed a motion in this court to compel non-party American States Insurance Company to comply with a Southern District of Indiana subpoena duces tecum dated July 15,1999. American States objected to the subpoena and has refused to produce some witness statements and summaries of witness interviews, arguing that the documents are protected from discovery because…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Leo Logan v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCoo v. Denny's Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Long v. Anderson UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Meighan v. Transguard Insurance Co. of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.